[860] Sonnet: Love Is Not All
My thanks are due to Rajat Sharma for introducing me to this poem:
Love is not all: It is not meat nor drink
Nor slumber nor a roof against the rain,
Nor yet a floating spar to men that sink
and rise and sink and rise and sink again.
Love cannot fill the thickened lung with breath
Nor clean the blood, nor set the fractured bone;
Yet many a man is making friends with death
even as I speak, for lack of love alone.
It well may be that in a difficult hour,
pinned down by need and moaning for release
or nagged by want past resolution's power,
I might be driven to sell your love for peace,
Or trade the memory of this night for food.
It may well be. I do not think I would.
-- Edna St. Vincent Millay
|
"Monday burn Millay, Wednesday Whitman, Friday Faulkner, burn 'em to ashes,
then burn the ashes. That's our official slogan."
-- Ray Bradbury, "Fahrenheit 451"
I read Bradbury's classic cautionary tale long before I had even heard of
Millay, but I assumed (given the august company she was placed in) that she
was a writer of note. Unfortunately, the first few poems of hers that I came
across were remarkably unremarkable, and so I added Millay to my list of
Poets Whom Other People Like.
That categorization has changed, though, and I think it was today's poem
which changed it. The tinge of desperation that colours even her most
romantic offerings is present, of course, but there's something else as
well: a compression of thought and word and deed, a _concentration_
reminiscent of no one so much as the early Dylan Thomas. The relentless flow
of metaphors in the opening three lines, the density of syllables in the
wonderful third couplet, the desolation of the sestet - they're all handled
with consummate craftsmanship, and they come together to form a whole that
unequivocally _works_.
The twist right at the end is typical. The lines preceding it are dark, yes,
but where some writers would have been cynical, Millay's tone is one of
experience refined by sorrow. She knows first-hand what love can and cannot
do, and that knowledge makes her final, defiant affirmation of its
importance all the more poignant and powerful. Love is not everything, but
it does not need to be; what it is, is enough.
thomas.
[Minstrels Links]
Edna St. Vincent Millay:
Poem #34, First Fig
Poem #49, The Unexplorer
Poem #108, The Penitent
Poem #317, Inland
Poem #590, Sonnet XLIII
Poem #604, Euclid Alone Has Looked On Beauty Bare
Poem #817, Grown-up
Walt Whitman:
Poem #54, When I heard the Learn'd Astronomer
Poem #157, O Captain! My Captain!
Poem #268, The Dalliance of the Eagles
Poem #246, I Hear America Singing
Poem #445, A Noiseless Patient Spider
Poem #498, The World Below the Brine
Poem #508, I saw in Louisiana a Live-Oak Growing
From: SFX106@
great poem
From: sandi_ordinario@
Hi,
This is Millay's take on love. She is trying to be practical
in so many lines on what love is NOT. In essence she is saying
love cannot fulfill the basic necessities of life like food,
housing. Neither can it be a spiritual buoy for the lost and
sinking which of course I tend to disagree. According to her,
Love cannot also heal or alleviate bodily diseases or
discomfort although some men would rather consider death than
live without love. After these contemplative considerations,
Edna starts to reason out what possible things might make her
compromise her love. Certain things such as being "pinned down
by need, moaning for release (gasping for air could be another way to
describe it)" or succumbing to want (temptation, perhaps) beyond
her powers to resist. She might give up love for peace,
or exchange the memory of what she and her lover had just
experienced for some physical necessity and yet...maybe not at all.
The last line gives love's lasting attributes examined under the
harsh light of reality some hope.
Sandi
From: CYNTRIGGS@
ITSUCKS!!!!!!
From: <clark2tc@>
Accuracy is important! Line #10 should read:
Pinned down by pain and moaning for release,
Line #14 should read: It well may be. I do not think I would.
C. Clark