[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Thread Index]
flames
- Subject: flames
- From: Mike Jewell <mjewell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Dec 1998 00:36:32 GMT
- Approved: ahbou-mod@acpub.duke.edu
- Distribution: world
- Followup-to: alt.humor.best-of-usenet.d
- Newsgroups: alt.humor.best-of-usenet
- Organization: best of usenet humor
- Xref: rice alt.humor.best-of-usenet:10857
>Nathan Sullivan wrote in message
><87btl2e3zr.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
>[excise]
>>One little, two little, three little flames
>>Four little, five little, six little flames
>>Seven little, eight little, nine little flames
>>Ten little flames from a tiny little comment like that...
>>
>>Damn! Gotta work on that last line.
Ten little flames all on one line
One got ^W and then there were nine
Nine little flames full of venomous hate
One got cancelled and then there were eight
Eight little flames posted straight from Devon
The feed dropped one and then there were seven
Seven little flames written just for kicks
On got killfiled and then there were six
Six little flames buzzing like a hive
One got ignored and then there were five
Five little flames written by a bore
One got larted and then there were four
Four little flames complaining about fees
One was misposted and then there were three
Three little flames saying "$@#% you!"
One wasn't carried and then there were two
Two little flames (I'm almost done!)
One went to NANAE and then there was one
One little flame all alone
The cancelbots caught it and then there were none!